PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 4, 2014Econometric Reviews2,853 citations

Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels

View Full Paper
M. Hashem Pesaran
M. Hashem PesaranUniversity of Southern California

Key Points

  • To examine the implicit null hypothesis and empirical performance of the cross-sectional dependence (CD) test when evaluating weak cross-sectional dependence in large panel data models.
  • Derived the theoretical properties of the CD test using the cross-sectional dependence exponent (α) under different relative expansion rates of cross-sectional units (N) and time periods (T).
  • Performed Monte Carlo experiments across multiple combinations of N and T, testing specifications with and without lagged dependent variables and assessing error distribution symmetry.
  • Demonstrated that the implicit null hypothesis of the CD test is 0 ≤ α ≤ (2 - ε)/4 when T = O(N^ε), which reduces to 0 ≤ α ≤ 1/4 when N and T grow at proportional rates (T/N → κ).
  • Confirmed via Monte Carlo simulations that the CD test maintains correct statistical size for α within [0, 1/4] across all tested N and T combinations, regardless of lagged dependent variables, provided error distributions are symmetric.

Abstract

This article considers testing the hypothesis that errors in a panel data model are weakly cross-sectionally dependent, using the exponent of cross-sectional dependence α, introduced recently in Bailey, Kapetanios, and Pesaran (2012). It is shown that the implicit null of the cross-sectional dependence (CD) test depends on the relative expansion rates of N and T . When T = O ( N -super-ε), for some 0 > ε ≤1, then the implicit null of the CD test is given by 0 ≤ α > (2 - ε)/4, which gives 0 ≤ α >1/4, when N and T tend to infinity at the same rate such that T / N → κ, with κ being a finite positive constant. It is argued that in the case of large N panels, the null of weak dependence is more appropriate than the null of independence which could be quite restrictive for large panels. Using Monte Carlo experiments, it is shown that the CD test has the correct size for values of α in the range 0, 1/4, for all combinations of N and T , and irrespective of whether the panel contains lagged values of the dependent variables, so long as there are no major asymmetries in the error distribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

M. Hashem Pesaran (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6c337639f29d8dcab3097https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics1980 · 8,972 citations
  2. 2Socio‐economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment2002 · 366 citations
  3. 3General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels2004 · 8,443 citations
  4. 4Spatial Processes, Models and Applications1983 · 2,654 citations
  5. 5Modeling Regional Interdependencies Using a Global Vector Error-Correcting Macroeconometric Model2001 · 179 citations