PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2011Child Care Health and Development588 citations

Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children

View Full Paper
SLSamuel W. LoganLRLeah E. RobinsonAWAlan E. Wilson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

(1) implementation of any type of motor skill intervention; (2) pre- and post-qualitative assessment of FMS; and (3) availability of means and standard deviations of motor performance. A significant positive effect of motor skill interventions on the improvement of FMS in children was found (d= 0.39, P < 0.001). Results indicate that object control (d= 0.41, P < 0.001) and locomotor skills (d= 0.45, P < 0.001) improved similarly from pre- to post-intervention. The overall effect size for control groups (i.e. free play) was not significant (d= 0.06, P= 0.33). A Pearson correlation indicated a non-significant (P= 0.296), negative correlation (r=-0.18) between effect size of pre- to post-improvement of FMS and the duration of the intervention (in minutes). Motor skill interventions are effective in improving FMS in children. Early childhood education centres should implement 'planned' movement programmes as a strategy to promote motor skill development in children.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Logan et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6d027fca0359822aa8a78https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper