PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2022Research Synthesis Methods598 citationsOpen Access

Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching

View Full Paper
NHNeal HaddawayMGMatthew GraingerCGCharles T. Gray

Key Points

  • To develop a tool for efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic reviews.
  • Developed an R package and Shiny app for citation chasing.
  • Facilitated rapid access to citations from a starting set of articles.
  • Described backend code functionality and user interface of the Shiny app.
  • Enabled identification of relevant studies that may not be captured by traditional search methods.
  • Streamlined the citation chasing process, reducing resource demands and procedural bias.
  • Provided a free tool that enhances systematic review methodologies.

Abstract

Systematic searching aims to find all possibly relevant research from multiple sources, the basis for an unbiased and comprehensive evidence base. Along with bibliographic databases, systematic reviewers use a variety of additional methods to minimise procedural bias. Citation chasing exploits connections between research articles to identify relevant records for a review by making use of explicit mentions of one article within another. Citation chasing is a popular supplementary search method because it helps to build on the work of primary research and review authors. It does so by identifying potentially relevant studies that might otherwise not be retrieved by other search methods; for example, because they did not use the review authors' search terms in the specified combinations in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. Here, we briefly provide an overview of citation chasing as a method for systematic reviews. Furthermore, given the challenges and high resource requirements associated with citation chasing, the limited application of citation chasing in otherwise rigorous systematic reviews, and the potential benefit of identifying terminologically disconnected but semantically linked research studies, we have developed and describe a free and open source tool that allows for rapid forward and backward citation chasing. We introduce citationchaser, an R package and Shiny app for conducting forward and backward citation chasing from a starting set of articles. We describe the sources of data, the backend code functionality, and the user interface provided in the Shiny app.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haddaway et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d70e67e328128020aa8b74https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1563
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Using citation tracking for systematic literature searching - study protocol for a scoping review of methodological studies and a Delphi study [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]2021
  2. 2BibliZap: An exploratory evaluation of an automated multi-level citation searching tool for systematic and rapid reviews2026
  3. 3CiteSource: An R package for data-driven search strategy development and enhanced evidence synthesis reporting2026
  4. 4All about citation chasing and tools that does citation chasing like Citation Gecko, Connected papers, Research Rabbit, LitMaps and more2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review2023