PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2001The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1,046 citations

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants

View Full Paper
LFLendra FriesenRSRobert V. ShannonDBDeniz Başkent

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition were measured in five normal-hearing listeners, ten listeners with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, and nine listeners with the Advanced Bionics Clarion cochlear implant. Recognition was measured as a function of the number of spectral channels (noise bands or electrodes) at signal-to-noise ratios of + 15, + 10, +5, 0 dB, and in quiet. Performance with three different speech processing strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and SAS) was similar across all conditions, and improved as the number of electrodes increased (up to seven or eight) for all conditions. For all noise levels, vowel and consonant recognition with the SPEAK speech processor did not improve with more than seven electrodes, while for normal-hearing listeners, performance continued to increase up to at least 20 channels. Speech recognition on more difficult speech materials (word and sentence recognition) showed a marginally significant increase in Nucleus-22 listeners from seven to ten electrodes. The average implant score on all processing strategies was poorer than scores of NH listeners with similar processing. However, the best CI scores were similar to the normal-hearing scores for that condition (up to seven channels). CI listeners with the highest performance level increased in performance as the number of electrodes increased up to seven, while CI listeners with low levels of speech recognition did not increase in performance as the number of electrodes was increased beyond four. These results quantify the effect of number of spectral channels on speech recognition in noise and demonstrate that most CI subjects are not able to fully utilize the spectral information provided by the number of electrodes used in their implant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Friesen et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d715ed3f906f6a06bef018https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1381538
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Electrodes Used in the SPEAK Cochlear Implant Speech Processor1997 · 380 citations
  2. 2Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant.1992 · 33 citations
  3. 3The Effects of Limiting the Number of Nucleus 22 Cochlear Implant Electrodes Programmed on Speech Perception1992 · 44 citations
  4. 4Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects1987 · 51 citations
  5. 5Temporal representations with cochlear implants.1997 · 131 citations