PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1999Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology1,303 citationsOpen Access

Normative Data Stratified by Age and Education for Two Measures of Verbal Fluency: FAS and Animal Naming

View Full Paper
TTTom N. TombaughJKJ. KozakLRLaura Rees

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Normative data stratified by three levels of age (16-59, 60-79, and 80-95 years) and three levels of education (0-8, 9-12, and 13-21 years) are presented for phonemic verbal fluency (FAS) and categorical verbal fluency (Animal Naming). The normative sample, aged 16 to 95 years, consisted of 1,300 cognitively intact individuals who resided in the community. Years of education ranged from 0 to 21. The total number of words in 1 minute for each of the letters F, A, and S was correlated r =.52 with the number of animal names generated in 1 minute. Regression analyses showed that FAS was more sensitive to the effects of education (18.6% of the variance) than age (11.0% of the variance). The opposite relationship occurred for Animal Naming, where age accounted for 23.4% of the variance and education accounted only for 13.6%. Gender accounted for less than 1% of variance for FAS and Animal Naming. The clinical utility of these norms is discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tombaugh et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d721ff236f4746d4563a2ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/14.2.167
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper