PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 12, 2010Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences864 citationsOpen Access

Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution

View Full Paper
JHJason E. HillTITerrie E. InderJNJeffrey J. Neil

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the patterns of cortical expansion in infants and adults, linking it to evolutionary changes.
  • Compared 12 healthy infants born at term with 12 healthy young adults
  • Analyzed postnatal cortical growth in various regions of the cerebral cortex
  • Compared human cortex patterns with those of macaque monkeys.
  • Lateral temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex regions expanded nearly twice as much as insular and medial occipital cortex
  • Indications of regional differences in dendritic and synaptic maturity at birth
  • Patterns of human evolutionary expansion align closely with postnatal cortical changes.

Abstract

The cerebral cortex of the human infant at term is complexly folded in a similar fashion to adult cortex but has only one third the total surface area. By comparing 12 healthy infants born at term with 12 healthy young adults, we demonstrate that postnatal cortical expansion is strikingly nonuniform: regions of lateral temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex expand nearly twice as much as other regions in the insular and medial occipital cortex. This differential postnatal expansion may reflect regional differences in the maturity of dendritic and synaptic architecture at birth and/or in the complexity of dendritic and synaptic architecture in adults. This expression may also be associated with differential sensitivity of cortical circuits to childhood experience and insults. By comparing human and macaque monkey cerebral cortex, we infer that the pattern of human evolutionary expansion is remarkably similar to the pattern of human postnatal expansion. To account for this correspondence, we hypothesize that it is beneficial for regions of recent evolutionary expansion to remain less mature at birth, perhaps to increase the influence of postnatal experience on the development of these regions or to focus prenatal resources on regions most important for early survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hill et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d738fd3f2a6ac123b8aa33https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001229107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the development of human corticospinal oscillations: age‐related changes in EEG–EMG coherence and cumulant2008 · 59 citations
  2. 2Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans2004 · 659 citations
  3. 3Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in children: maturity of corticospinal pathway and problem of clinical application1997 · 171 citations
  4. 4On and Off magnetic auditory evoked responses in early infancy: A possible marker of brain immaturity2007 · 26 citations
  5. 5A Surface-Based Analysis of Hemispheric Asymmetries and Folding of Cerebral Cortex in Term-Born Human Infants2010 · 314 citations