PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1978IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing6,682 citations

Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition

View Full Paper
HSHiroaki SakoeSCSeibi Chiba

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize a dynamic programming-based algorithm for better spoken word recognition accuracy.
  • Developed a time-normalization algorithm using time-warping functions.
  • Derived and compared two distance definitions: symmetric and asymmetric forms.
  • Introduced slope constraint to enhance discrimination between different word categories.
  • The optimized algorithm achieved about two-thirds fewer errors compared to the best conventional algorithm.
  • The symmetric form showed superiority over the asymmetric form in terms of performance.
  • Qualitative analysis determined optimum conditions for the slope constraint technique.

Abstract

This paper reports on an optimum dynamic progxamming (DP) based time-normalization algorithm for spoken word recognition. First, a general principle of time-normalization is given using time-warping function. Then, two time-normalized distance definitions, called symmetric and asymmetric forms, are derived from the principle. These two forms are compared with each other through theoretical discussions and experimental studies. The symmetric form algorithm superiority is established. A new technique, called slope constraint, is successfully introduced, in which the warping function slope is restricted so as to improve discrimination between words in different categories. The effective slope constraint characteristic is qualitatively analyzed, and the optimum slope constraint condition is determined through experiments. The optimized algorithm is then extensively subjected to experimental comparison with various DP-algorithms, previously applied to spoken word recognition by different research groups. The experiment shows that the present algorithm gives no more than about two-thirds errors, even compared to the best conventional algorithm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sakoe et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d760c7ef4aa71f97f31041https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1978.1163055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper