PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1998Organizational Research Methods1,212 citationsOpen Access

A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research

RBRichard P. BagozziJEJeffrey R. Edwards

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A key assumption underlying methods of construct validation is that constructs and their indicators are represented at the appropriate depth (i.e., the specificity versus generality of constructs and their indicators). This article presents a framework that depicts constructs and indicators at various depths and provides guidelines for choosing from among these depths. The framework is then integrated with methods of construct validation based on the confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices. The authors apply these methods to the measurement of work values, using the Work Aspect Preference Scale (WAPS). Results show that the WAPS performs better when used to represent relatively specific work values as opposed to more global, general values. Further analyses supported the generalizability of the WAPS factor structure for men and women, although gender differences were found on structured means for several latent value dimensions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bagozzi et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d76bab3f1c8b69fd48f49dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper