PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2020Scientific Reports207 citationsOpen Access

Test-time augmentation for deep learning-based cell segmentation on microscopy images

NMNikita MoshkovBMBotond MatheAKAttila Kertész‐Farkas

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Recent advancements in deep learning have revolutionized the way microscopy images of cells are processed. Deep learning network architectures have a large number of parameters, thus, in order to reach high accuracy, they require a massive amount of annotated data. A common way of improving accuracy builds on the artificial increase of the training set by using different augmentation techniques. A less common way relies on test-time augmentation (TTA) which yields transformed versions of the image for prediction and the results are merged. In this paper we describe how we have incorporated the test-time argumentation prediction method into two major segmentation approaches utilized in the single-cell analysis of microscopy images. These approaches are semantic segmentation based on the U-Net, and instance segmentation based on the Mask R-CNN models. Our findings show that even if only simple test-time augmentations (such as rotation or flipping and proper merging methods) are applied, TTA can significantly improve prediction accuracy. We have utilized images of tissue and cell cultures from the Data Science Bowl (DSB) 2018 nuclei segmentation competition and other sources. Additionally, boosting the highest-scoring method of the DSB with TTA, we could further improve prediction accuracy, and our method has reached an ever-best score at the DSB.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moshkov et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77594ef4aa71f97f315f0https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61808-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nuclear segmentation in microscope cell images: A hand-segmented dataset and comparison of algorithms2009 · 202 citations
  2. 2High-Content Phenotypic Profiling of Drug Response Signatures across Distinct Cancer Cells2010 · 180 citations
  3. 3Mask R-CNN2018 · 3,495 citations
  4. 4Test-time Data Augmentation for Estimation of Heteroscedastic Aleatoric Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks2018 · 132 citations
  5. 5nucleAIzer: A Parameter-free Deep Learning Framework for Nucleus Segmentation Using Image Style Transfer2020 · 287 citations