PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1947Biometrics578 citations

Probability Tables for Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods

View Full Paper
FWFrank Wilcoxon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In previous papers 3 4 a ranking method has been described for the rapid approximate determination of the significance of differences between two treatments, when the experimental data consists of unpaired replications, paired replications, or replications occurring in two or more groups. Brief tables were given which furnished the rank totals for the 0.05%o, 0.02% and 0.01% level of significance. These tables were prepared by making use of certain properties of the partitions of numbers, but the method becomes impractical with larger numbers of replicates. A recent paper by Mann and Whitney 1 describes a similar test and gives probability tables covering the range from 3 to 8 replicates per treatment, including the case of unequal numbers of unpaired replicates under the two treatments. These authors tabulated the probabilities against the serial number of possible rank totals, 0-1-2 .... U, instead of the rank total itself. Their tables give probabilities for one tail of the distribution only.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frank Wilcoxon (1947) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77ffdb1cb92dd1bb8b7f5https://doi.org/10.2307/3001946
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper