PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 9, 2013Journal of Sports Sciences128 citations

Effects of small-sided game and change-of-direction training on reactive agility and change-of-direction speed

View Full Paper
WYWarren YoungNRNathan Rogers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of training change-of-direction speed and small-sided games on performance in the Planned-AFL agility test and reactive agility. Twenty-five elite-standard U-18 Australian Rules football players were randomly allocated either to a change-of-direction group or a small-sided games group. Players participated in one or two 15-min sessions per week with 11 sessions conducted over a 7-week period during the season. Tests conducted immediately before and after the training period included the Planned-AFL agility test and a video-based reactive agility test specific to Australian Rules football. The reactive agility test variables were total time, decision time and movement response time. The small-sided games group improved total time (P = 0.008, effect size = 0.93), which was entirely attributable to a very large reduction in decision time (P 0.05). The change-of-direction training produced small to trivial changes in all of the test variables (P > 0.05, effect size = 0-0.2). The results suggest that small-sided games improve agility performance by enhancing the speed of decision-making rather than movement speed. The change-of-direction training was not effective for developing either change-of-direction speed as measured by the Planned-AFL test or reactive agility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Young et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d78e6cb843b2be99490468https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.823230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper