PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 13, 2004Journal of Applied Physiology1,706 citations

Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image

View Full Paper
WSWei ShenMPMark PunyanityaZWZiMian Wang

Structured PICO

Does a single abdominal cross-sectional image accurately estimate total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes compared to whole body multislice MRI in healthy adults?

P
Population
328 healthy adult subjects (123 men, 205 women) for model development, plus an additional 49 subjects for validation.
I
Intervention
Estimation of total body skeletal muscle (SM) and adipose tissue (AT) volumes from a single abdominal cross-sectional image
C
Comparator
Whole body multislice magnetic resonance imaging (reference standard)
O
Outcome
Correlation between single abdominal SM and AT slice areas and total body SM and AT volumessurrogate

A single abdominal cross-sectional image can accurately estimate total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults, offering a practical alternative to whole-body imaging.

Abstract

A single abdominal cross-sectional computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance image is often obtained in studies examining adipose tissue (AT) distribution. An abdominal image might also provide additional useful information on total body skeletal muscle (SM) and AT volumes with related physiological insights. We therefore investigated the relationships between abdominal SM and AT areas from single images and total body component volumes in a large and diverse sample of healthy adult subjects. Total body SM and AT volumes were derived by whole body multislice magnetic resonance imaging in 123 men age (mean +/- SD) of 41.6 +/- 15.8 yr; body mass index of 25.9 +/- 3.4 kg/m(2) and 205 women (age of 47.8 +/- 18.7 yr; body mass index of 26.7 +/- 5.6 kg/m(2)). Single abdominal SM and AT slice areas were highly correlated with total body SM (r = 0.71-0.92; r = 0.90 at L(4)-L(5) intervertebral space) and AT (r = 0.84-0.96; r = 0.94 at L(4)-L(5) intervertebral space) volumes, respectively. R(2) increased by only 5.7-6.1% for SM and 2.7-4.4% for AT with the inclusion of subject sex, age, ethnicity, scanning position, body mass index, and waist circumference in the model. The developed SM and AT models were validated in an additional 49 subjects. To achieve equivalent power to a study measuring total body SM or AT volumes, a study using a single abdominal image would require 17-24% more subjects for SM and 6-12% more subjects for AT. Measurement of a single abdominal image can thus provide estimates of total body SM and AT for group studies of healthy adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7adf0b843b2be99490616https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper