PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1996Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics16 citations

Two-component spreading phenomena: Why the geometry makes the criticality

View Full Paper
NVNicolas VandewalleMAMarcel Ausloos

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We have numerically and theoretically investigated a simple model for two-component spreading phenomena in two different growth geometries (i. e. , spreading confined in a half space and spreading in a free space). The criticality of the domain substructures unexpectedly depends on the considered geometry. This is understood by simple arguments of domain-wall particle diffusion and annihilation. We derive a relationship between the critical exponents and for domain-wall spatial distributions in different geometries. The latter relationship is numerically verified in two, three, and four dimensions. 1996 The American Physical Society.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandewalle et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7bfa361e2ce1627d17d84https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.54.3006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Magnetic Eden Model1993 · 55 citations
  2. 2Symposium on information theory in biology1959 · 236 citations
  3. 3Scaling properties of the surface of the Eden model in d=2, 3, 41985 · 211 citations
  4. 4Surface Width Exponents for Three- and Four-Dimensional Eden Growth1987 · 184 citations
  5. 5Lack of universality in two-dimensional multicomponent spreading phenomena1995 · 10 citations