PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 24, 2016Qualitative Health Research3,971 citationsOpen Access

Member Checking

LBLinda BirtSSSuzanne E. ScottDCDebbie Cavers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The trustworthiness of results is the bedrock of high quality qualitative research. Member checking, also known as participant or respondent validation, is a technique for exploring the credibility of results. Data or results are returned to participants to check for accuracy and resonance with their experiences. Member checking is often mentioned as one in a list of validation techniques. This simplistic reporting might not acknowledge the value of using the method, nor its juxtaposition with the interpretative stance of qualitative research. In this commentary, we critique how member checking has been used in published research, before describing and evaluating an innovative in-depth member checking technique, Synthesized Member Checking. The method was used in a study with patients diagnosed with melanoma. Synthesized Member Checking addresses the co-constructed nature of knowledge by providing participants with the opportunity to engage with, and add to, interview and interpreted data, several months after their semi-structured interview.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Birt et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7c5c72f3446b9d5d17d7bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper