PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 29, 2013BMC Medical Research Methodology22 citationsOpen Access

Direct risk standardisation: a new method for comparing casemix adjusted event rates using complex models

JNJon NichollRJRichard JacquesMCMichael J. Campbell

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Direct risk standardisation using our proposed method is as straightforward as using conventional direct or indirect standardisation, always enables fair comparisons of performance to be made, can use continuous casemix covariates, and was found in our examples to have similar standard errors to the SMR. It should be preferred when there is a risk that conventional direct or indirect standardisation will lead to unfair comparisons.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicholl et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7c9ddec32c73b01ae29e2https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Methods for age‐adjustment of rates1983 · 109 citations
  2. 2The value and hazards of standardization in clinical epidemiologic research1988 · 25 citations
  3. 3Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.1987 · 1,702 citations
  4. 4Derivation and validation of a risk adjustment model for predicting seven day mortality in emergency medical admissions: mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study2012 · 36 citations
  5. 5Standardisation of rates using logistic regression: a comparison with the direct method2008 · 90 citations