PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2009Implementation Science660 citationsOpen Access

Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice

LLLinda LiJGJeremy GrimshawCNCamilla Palmhøj Nielsen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The different interpretations of CoP make it challenging to apply the concept or to take full advantage of the benefits that CoP groups may offer. The tension between satisfying individuals' needs for personal growth and empowerment versus an organization's bottom line is perhaps the most contentious of the issues that make CoPs difficult to cultivate. Since CoP is still an evolving concept, we recommend focusing on optimizing specific characteristics of the concept, such as support for members interacting with each other, sharing knowledge, and building a sense of belonging within networks/teams/groups. Interventions that facilitate relationship building among members and that promote knowledge exchange may be useful for optimizing the function of these groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7da05ec32c73b01ae305ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-11
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1All Kids Count Connections2004 · 16 citations
  2. 2Social Life of Information2001 · 231 citations
  3. 3Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions2004 · 1,302 citations
  4. 4Cultivating communities of practice2013 · 2,725 citations
  5. 5The Internet and Higher Education2009 · 491 citations