PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001Psychological Bulletin4,423 citations

The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.

View Full Paper
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. JudgeUniversity of Mendoza
CTCarl J. ThoresenTulane UniversityJBJoyce E. BonoUniversity of Iowa

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A qualitative and quantitative review of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance is provided. The qualitative review is organized around 7 models that characterize past research on the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. Although some models have received more support than have others, research has not provided conclusive confirmation or disconfirmation of any model, partly because of a lack of assimilation and integration in the literature. Research devoted to testing these models waned following 2 meta-analyses of the job satisfaction-job performance relationship. Because of limitations in these prior analyses and the misinterpretation of their findings, a new meta-analysis was conducted on 312 samples with a combined N of 54,417. The mean true correlation between overall job satisfaction and job performance was estimated to be .30. In light of these results and the qualitative review, an agenda for future research on the satisfaction-performance relationship is provided.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Judge et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7ebf35c3030ff03d183ebhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper