PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2023Journal of Endourology20 citationsOpen Access

Fully Automated Longitudinal Assessment of Renal Stone Burden on Serial CT Imaging Using Deep Learning

PMPritam MukherjeeSLSungwon LeeDEDaniel C. Elton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose: Use deep learning (DL) to automate the measurement and tracking of kidney stone burden over serial CT scans. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 259 scans from 113 symptomatic patients being treated for urolithiasis at a single medical center between 2006 and 2019. These patients underwent a standard low-dose noncontrast CT scan followed by ultra-low-dose CT scans limited to the level of the kidneys. A DL model was used to detect, segment, and measure the volume of all stones in both initial and follow-up scans. The stone burden was characterized by the total volume of all stones in a scan (SV). The absolute and relative change of SV, (SVA and SVR, respectively) over serial scans were computed. The automated assessments were compared with manual assessments using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and their agreement was visualized using Bland-Altman and scatter plots. Results: Two hundred twenty-eight out of 233 scans with stones were identified by the automated pipeline; per-scan sensitivity was 97.8% (95% confidence interval CI: 96.0-99.7). The per-scan positive predictive value was 96.6% (95% CI: 94.4-98.8). The median SV, SVA, and SVR were 476.5 mm3, -10 mm3, and 0.89, respectively. After removing outliers outside the 5th and 95th percentiles, the CCC measuring agreement on SV, SVA, and SVR were 0.995 (0.992-0.996), 0.980 (0.972-0.986), and 0.915 (0.881-0.939), respectively Conclusions: The automated DL-based measurements showed good agreement with the manual assessments of the stone burden and its interval change on serial CT scans.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukherjee et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80d9f45af6083e6ae2bbchttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States2012 · 2,618 citations
  2. 2Renal stone epidemiology: A 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota1979 · 523 citations
  3. 3US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard2002 · 289 citations
  4. 4Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements2019 · 25 citations
  5. 5Natural History of Asymptomatic Renal Stones and Prediction of Stone Related Events2012 · 68 citations