PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2013Journal of Clinical Oncology4,091 citationsOpen Access

Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Update

View Full Paper
AWAntonio C. WolffMHM. Elizabeth HammondDHDavid G. Hicks

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to > 10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing. This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both Journal of Clinical Oncology and the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wolff et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80dd733ca018b39ae32c4https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.50.9984
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing2012 · 7,898 citations
  2. 2USE OF CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AGAINST HER2 FOR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER THAT OVEREXPRESSES HER22009 · 1,201 citations
  3. 3Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score2008 · 224 citations
  4. 4Abstract P3-10-36: Concordance of HER2 Central Assessment by Two International Central Laboratories: A Ring Study within the Framework of the Adjuvant HER2-Positive ALTTO Trial (BIG2-06/N063D/EGF106708)2010 · 6 citations
  5. 5Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Assessment in a Case-Control Study: Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Performed by Central Laboratories2010 · 135 citations