PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1974Biotropica559 citations

Flowering Phenology and Diversity in Tropical Bignoniaceae

View Full Paper
AGAlwyn H. Gentry

Key Points

  • To examine how distinct flowering phenology strategies enable pollinator sharing and promote high species richness among tropical Bignoniaceae.
  • Analyzed flowering phenology patterns and pollination mechanisms among 76 Bignoniaceae species native to Costa Rica and Panama.
  • Categorized flower production strategies and cataloged associated pollen vectors, including bees, bats, hummingbirds, hawkmoths, and butterflies.
  • Identified five distinct flowering phenology patterns, four of which characterize different bee-pollinated species.
  • Demonstrated that the majority of bee-pollinated species partition shared pollinator resources through temporal flowering schedules rather than floral morphological differentiation.

Abstract

Central American Bignoniaceae show five distinct patterns of flowering phenology. Four of these phenol6gical types characterize different bee-pollinated species. Only the generalized cornucopia strategy is employed by temperate Bignoniaceae. In the tropics this strategy is also prevalent and is often associated with a seasonal sequence of flowering by related species. The more specialized phenological strategies employed by many tropical species of Bignoniaceae are viewed as making possible differential and essentially contemporaneous attraction of similar pollinators from the same limited pollinator resource. The high diversity of tropical Bignoniaceae appears to be facilitated by use of a variety of phenological strategies by the different species. It is suggested that such mechanisms may be an important factor in maintaining increased tropical diversity in other groups of plants. DIFFERENCES IN flowering phenology among Central American Bignoniaceae illustrate an overlooked mechanism for maintenance of high species diversity in tropical plant communities. The ecological importance of these differences in phenology is in making possible effective and often contemporaneous sharing by numerous plant species of a limited pollinator resource. Evolutionary diversification of floral morphology in the Bignoniaceae has, of course, given rise to genera employing most of the potential pollen vectors available in a tropical community (Gentry 1972, 1973). But although bats (in Parmentiera, Crescentia, Dendrosicus), hummingbirds (in Mawrtinella), hawkmoths (in Tanaecium), and butterflies and small bees (in Tynnanthus and Arrabidaea florida) are the principal pollinators of some Bignoniaceae, the majority of the 76 species occurring naturally in Costa Rica and Panama are pollinated by large and medium-sized bees, especially female euglossines. In some bee-pollinated species additional morphologic specializations further restrict potential pollen vectors as in Amphilophium where pseudocleistogamous flowers which never open spontaneously can be entered only by the strongest members of the apifauna (Megachile, large anthophorids, presumably xylocopids). However, most bee-pollinated species of Bignoniaceae secure their requisite pollinators by different strategies of flower production rather than morphologic differentiation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alwyn H. Gentry (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80f6aa2a48916bbbeec36https://doi.org/10.2307/2989698
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper