PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2000Journal of Applied Psychology277 citationsOpen Access

Action–state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables.

View Full Paper
JDJames M. DiefendorffRHRosalie J. HallRLRobert G. Lord

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Data from 6 studies (N = 945) were combined to examine the factor structure and construct validity of J. Kuhl's (1994a) measure of action-state orientation, the Action Control Scale (ACS). Initial confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of 4 models showed poor fit with the data. Items that did not perform well were dropped, and the 4 CFA models were retested, resulting in support for a 3-factor solution corresponding to the Preoccupation, Hesitation, and Volatility subscales. Regression analyses demonstrated that the revised ACS subscales measure a construct distinct from cognitive ability and personality. The revised subscales showed differential statistically significant relationships with (a) self-regulatory and self-focus variables and (b) job attitudes and ratings of job performance. The authors conclude that action-state orientation is a construct relevant to applied settings and that future research should further examine this construct.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diefendorff et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80fb766a29169b4bee08ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.250
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper