PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2018Environment International1,337 citationsOpen Access

Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes

RMRebecca L. MorganPWPaul WhaleyKTKristina A. Thayer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

First paragraph A clearly-framed question creates the structure and delineates the approach to defining research objectives, conducting systematic reviews and developing health guidance (Guyatt et al., 2011; Armstrong et al., 2007). To assess the association between exposures and outcomes, including in the field of nutrition, environmental and occupational health, the concept of defining the Population (including animal species), Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) as pillars of the question is increasingly accepted (Morgan et al., 2016; Morgan et al., n.d.). Thus, the PECO defines the objectives of the review or guideline. Furthermore, the PECO informs the study design or inclusion and exclusion criteria for a review, as well as facilitating the interpretation of the directness of the findings based on how well the actual research findings represent the original question.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morgan et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d81a21a2a48916bbbef0cdhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper