PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2015Democratization102 citationsOpen Access

The noble west and the dirty rest? Western democracy promoters and illiberal regional powers

View Full Paper
TBTanja A. Börzel

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This conclusion summarizes the major findings of this special issue and discusses their implications for research on democratization and international democracy promotion. First, I compare the interactions between EU and US democracy promotion and the responses of non-democratic regional powers. In the cases in which Russia, Saudi Arabia, and China chose to pursue a countervailing strategy, I match the reactions of the US and the EU and explore how the combined (inter-)actions of democratic and non-democratic actors have affected efforts at democracy promotion in the target countries. The second part discusses the theoretical implications of these findings and identifies challenges for theory-building. I argue that the literature still has to come to terms with a counter-intuitive finding of this special issue, namely that non-democratic actors can promote democratic change by unintentionally empowering liberal reform coalitions as much as democracy promoters can unwittingly enhance autocracy by stabilizing illiberal incumbent regimes. I conclude with some policy considerations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanja A. Börzel (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d855118cb8f39931ae308chttps://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.1000312
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper