PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 7, 2011Information Visualization579 citationsOpen Access

Visual comparison for information visualization

View Full Paper
MGMichael GleicherDADanielle AlbersRWRick Walker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Data analysis often involves the comparison of complex objects. With the ever increasing amounts and complexity of data, the demand for systems to help with these comparisons is also growing. Increasingly, information visualization tools support such comparisons explicitly, beyond simply allowing a viewer to examine each object individually. In this paper, we argue that the design of information visualizations of complex objects can, and should, be studied in general, that is independently of what those objects are. As a first step in developing this general understanding of comparison, we propose a general taxonomy of visual designs for comparison that groups designs into three basic categories, which can be combined. To clarify the taxonomy and validate its completeness, we provide a survey of work in information visualization related to comparison. Although we find a great diversity of systems and approaches, we see that all designs are assembled from the building blocks of juxtaposition, superposition and explicit encodings. This initial exploration shows the power of our model, and suggests future challenges in developing a general understanding of comparative visualization and facilitating the development of more comparative visualization tools.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gleicher et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d87ec9d2f7327e70ae349fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611416549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper