Background/Objective: Advanced peri-implantitis presents a significant challenge in contemporary implant dentistry and sometimes necessitates implant removal when regenerative therapies are no longer reliable. Protocols for staged bone reconstruction, re-implantation, and definitive prosthetic rehabilitation following peri-implantitis continue to evolve. This study aims to present a clinical case of advanced peri-implantitis with vertical interproximal bone loss managed with a staged surgical and prosthetic approach and review current concepts in implant removal, bone regeneration, re-implantation, and soft-tissue management. Methods: A patient with peri-implantitis affecting two maxillary implants underwent treatment over one year. The initial surgical stage included removal of the failing implants and reconstruction of the defects using guided bone regeneration with a composite graft of 50% xenogeneic bone substitute and 50% autogenous bone, covered by a barrier membrane. After six months of healing, a second surgical stage was performed, involving placement of two new implants in positions 2.2 and 2.4, additional bone augmentation, and soft tissue grafting to enhance soft tissue volume and the width of keratinized gingiva following mucogingival line rebounce. After an additional six months of osseointegration, full maxillary prosthetic rehabilitation was completed in August 2025. Results: Clinical and radiographic assessments demonstrated successful bone regeneration, stable implant integration, adequate peri-implant soft-tissue conditions, and favorable functional and esthetic outcomes at follow-up. The case is discussed in the context of current evidence regarding indications for implant removal, regenerative strategies after explantation, timing of re-implantation, and the importance of keratinized gingiva and prosthetic design in long-term peri-implant health. Conclusions: Staged explantation, guided bone regeneration, delayed re-implantation, and comprehensive soft-tissue and prosthetic management may represent a viable treatment strategy in selected cases of advanced peri-implantitis.
Spînu et al. (2026) studied this question.