PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Computers3 citationsOpen Access

From Virtual Worlds to Real-World Equity: A Scoping Review of the Metaverse as Computer-Assisted Learning for STEM Competencies

FPFranklin Parrales-BravoUniversidad Complutense de MadridRTRoberto Tolozano-BenitesCentral University of EcuadorJJJanio Jadán-GuerreroUniversidad Tecnológica Indoamérica

Key Points

  • The review aims to investigate the metaverse's effectiveness in enhancing STEM competencies and addressing equity in learning.
  • Conducted a scoping review of 34 studies published from 2015 to 2026.
  • Analyzed studies based on PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Examined various STEM competencies and their inclusivity across diverse learner populations.
  • Technology literacy and collaboration featured in 91.2% of studies, while mathematical application was addressed in only 44.1%.
  • Clear immediate learning gains noted through embodied presence and risk-free experimentation.
  • Evidence of inclusivity primarily focused on select populations, neglecting others such as students with disabilities and Indigenous learners.

Abstract

This scoping review critically synthesizes 34 studies (2015–2026) examining the metaverse’s role in fostering six core STEM competencies, moving beyond descriptive reporting to interrogate whether these technologies constitute genuine pedagogical transformation, whose learners are served or excluded, and how isolated interventions connect into lifelong learning pathways. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, our analysis reveals that while technology literacy and collaboration appear in 91.2% of our selected studies, mathematical application is addressed in fewer than half (44.1%), raising unanswered questions about whether this pattern reflects an equitable distribution of mathematical learning opportunities across diverse learner populations—a question the current evidence base cannot answer but one that warrants urgent investigation. The evidence demonstrates substantial immediate learning gains through embodied presence and risk-free experimentation, yet a deeper reading suggests this often represents technological optimization of traditional goals rather than epistemological transformation. More troublingly, the concentration of inclusivity evidence on select populations—while rendering students with physical disabilities, Indigenous learners, and refugee students entirely invisible—reveals an equity paradox where immersive technologies may inadvertently amplify existing disparities. The absence of any longitudinal data linking short-term engagement to sustained STEM participation leaves the field’s claim to transformative impact unsubstantiated. This review argues for moving beyond fragmented interventions toward designing coherent, equitable learning pathways that fulfill the metaverse’s potential for all learners.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parrales-Bravo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893c96c1944d70ce04bf3https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15040229
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper