PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026ChemPhysChem0 citations

Decoding the Heterodimer Stability of Pro‐Apoptotic Effectors via Multiscale Simulations: Mutational Insights Into Mitochondrial Signaling

View Full Paper
PPPratyush PaniIndian Institute of Science Education and Research BerhampurASA N Ramya ShreeM S Ramaiah University of Applied SciencesMRMalay Kumar RanaNational Institute of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate how specific mutations at the BAK-BAX interface affect its stability and functionality in apoptosis.
  • Used DUET to identify stabilizing and destabilizing mutations in BAK and BAX.
  • Conducted 1 μs molecular dynamics simulations to study structural dynamics.
  • Applied steered molecular dynamics to analyze the stability of mutant interfaces.
  • Employed Markov state modeling to assess dynamics using Kullback-Leibler divergence.
  • Performed alchemical free energy calculations to evaluate mutation effects.
  • L78D mutation in BAK enhances rigidity and stability of the heterodimer interface.
  • D68I mutation in BAX increases flexibility and promotes dissociation.
  • BAK-L78D retains wild-type dynamics, while BAX-D68I shows significant deviation in slow motions.
  • Alchemical calculations characterize the energetic costs of amino acid transformations.

Abstract

The BCL-2 protein family plays a central role in regulating mitochondrial apoptosis, with Bcl-2 antagonist killer 1 (BAK) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) acting as key effectors that oligomerize to disrupt the outer mitochondrial membrane. While the mechanisms behind their homo-oligomerization are well studied, much less is known about their heterodimer. In this work, we explored how specific point mutations at the BAK-BAX interface affect the heterodimer's structure, dynamics, and energetics. Using DUET, we identified stabilizing and destabilizing mutations from both subunits, which were then subjected to 1 μs molecular dynamics simulations. Across multiple structural metrics, the L78D mutation in BAK consistently appeared to enhance rigidity and compactness, while the D68I mutation in BAX led to increased flexibility and conformational drift. Steered MD shows that BAK-L78D strengthens the BAK-BAX interface, resisting separation, whereas BAX-D68I weakens it, leading to faster dissociation. Markov state modeling with Kullback-Leibler divergence indicates that BAK-L78D mirrors wild-type dynamics, while BAX-D68I deviates across key slow motions. Alchemical free energy calculations further delineates the cost of transformation from one amino acid to the other in case of both the mutations. Together, these results highlight BAK-L78D as a stabilizing mutation and BAX-D68I as a destabilizing variant that modulates complex integrity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893eb6c1944d70ce04ee0https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202500782
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper