This paper presents the results from in-lab chassis dynamometer testing of two battery electric vehicles of the same make and model: a 2022 model year vehicle with a heat pump and a 2020 model year vehicle with a resistive positive temperature coefficient (PTC)-type heater. The vehicles were tested over a series of standard drive cycles at −10 °C, −7 °C, 0 °C, and 25 °C to determine the impacts of the different heating systems on vehicle energy consumption and driving range in cold temperatures. The results indicate that in most (but not all) heating situations the heat pump heated its vehicle’s cabin more efficiently than the PTC heater did, especially at 0 °C. At the lowest temperature, −10 °C, the heat pump used more energy than the PTC heater on cold-start but was more efficient than the PTC heater once the cabin was warmed up. Over standard drive cycles and using SAE J1634 calculation methods to obtain a single range value for each cycle type, the improvement in the percentage of driving range retained by the heat pump-equipped vehicle over the PTC heater-equipped vehicle varied between 1% and 15% depending on ambient conditions and drive cycle, with the average advantage in percentage range retained being 7% over the UDDS cycle, 7% over the HWFET cycle, and 4% over the US06 cycle for all cold temperatures combined.
Humphries et al. (2026) studied this question.