PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Graph-Based Testing of Blockchain Topologies

View Full Paper
MSMohammad Muheeth Shaik

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore the application of graph models in analyzing and testing blockchain topologies.
  • Surveyed literature from 2015 to 2026 on blockchain topology testing.
  • Examined active and passive measurement techniques like TxProbe and TopoShot.
  • Reviewed large-scale simulation frameworks such as Lilith, Diablo, and Kollaps.
  • Analyzed advanced techniques including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
  • P2P overlay networks often demonstrate scale-free characteristics with heavy-tailed degree distributions.
  • Network topology significantly affects performance metrics such as propagation latency, which relates to fork rates and consensus instability.
  • A lack of standardization in benchmarking compromises cross-study comparisons, highlighting the need for standardized testing rubrics.

Abstract

The underlying peer-to-peer (P2P) network topology of a blockchain is a critical determinant of its core properties, including performance, security, decentralization, and scalability. Graph models provide a powerful and principled framework for representing, analyzing, and testing these complex network structures. This review surveys a broad corpus of peer-reviewed literature and technical reports from 2015 to 2026, focusing on the application of graph models to blockchain topology testing. The surveyed studies encompass active and passive measurement techniques (e.g., TxProbe, TopoShot), large-scale simulation frameworks (e.g., Lilith, Diablo, Kollaps), and advanced analytical approaches like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Principal findings reveal that P2P overlay networks often exhibit scale-free characteristics with heavy-tailed degree distributions, raising concerns about centralization. Network topology directly impacts performance metrics like propagation latency, which correlates with fork rates and consensus instability. The review concludes that while significant progress has been made, a lack of standardization in benchmarking hinders cross-study comparability, necessitating standardized testing rubrics and more sophisticated temporal graph models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohammad Muheeth Shaik (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895046c1944d70ce05ffchttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19457772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Application of Graph Theory for Blockchain Technologies2024 · 28 citations
  2. 2The Impact of Network Topology on Performance Metrics and Energy Consumption for Blockchains: Towards Repeatable Benchmarking2026
  3. 3A Survey on Protocol Testing in Blockchain Networks2026
  4. 4Multiple Sides of 36 Coins: Measuring Peer-to-Peer Infrastructure Across Cryptocurrencies2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems for Blockchain Transaction Network Analysis2026 · 2 citations