PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Procedia Structural Integrity0 citationsOpen Access

Stress–strain state of double-hinged reinforced concrete frames with artificial force regulation under repeated low-cycle loading

View Full Paper
SFSerhii FilipchukVKVictor KaravanOSOleksandr Sobishchanskyi

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the behavior of double-hinged reinforced concrete frames under low-cycle loading techniques, particularly focusing on artificial force regulation.
  • Conducted experimental study on double-hinged reinforced concrete frames.
  • Applied single and repeated low-cycle loading to observe stress-strain responses.
  • Measured total and residual deformations, deflections, and crack widths in frame elements.
  • Total deformations in concrete and reinforcement stabilize by the sixth loading cycle.
  • Bearing capacity improves by 5.3% under single loading and 20.3% under repeated loading with force regulation.
  • Deflection of the frame crossbar decreases by 16.1% under single loading and by 11.2% under repeated loading compared to frames without regulation.

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an experimental study on the behavior of double-hinged reinforced concrete frames with artificial force regulation subjected to single and repeated low-cycle loading. Low-cycle loading has a significant influence on the stress–strain state of U-shaped reinforced concrete frames with artificial force regulation. Under such loading, total and residual deformations of concrete and reinforcement, deflections, and crack widths in frame elements increase. It was found that total deformations in both concrete and reinforcement stabilize by the sixth loading cycle. The bearing capacity of a double-hinged reinforced concrete frame with artificial force regulation exceeds that of a similar frame without force regulation by 5.3% under single loading and by 20.3% under repeated loading. In addition, the deflection of the frame crossbar is reduced by 16.1% under single loading and by 11.2% under repeated loading compared to frames without artificial force regulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Filipchuk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895d86c1944d70ce06fe4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2026.03.069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper