PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Health Expectations0 citationsOpen Access

Towards Evidence of Rigour in Empirical Deliberative Democratic Methods: Development and Piloting of the C‐JuRI Framework

View Full Paper
EFEmma Kellie FrostUniversity of WollongongYAYves Saint James AquinoUniversity of WollongongABAnnette Braunack‐MayerUniversity of Wollongong

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and assess a framework for evaluating public involvement in decision-making processes.
  • Developed the C-JuRI framework to assess quality in public engagement initiatives.
  • Piloted the framework on a jury consisting of 28 public members.
  • Focused on deliberation regarding the use of AI in healthcare.
  • The framework was successfully applied in a real-world setting with the public jury.
  • Insights were gained about the strengths and weaknesses of AI deployment in healthcare based on public input.

Abstract

This framework is designed to evaluate the quality of initiatives to involve the public in decision-making. The framework was piloted on a jury in which 28 members of the public deliberated about the use of AI in healthcare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frost et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895ea6c1944d70ce070f8https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70608
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper