PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Business Strategy and the Environment0 citations

Sustainable Resilience in Critical Mineral Supply Chains: An ESG and Circular Economy Perspective

View Full Paper
HTHasan TutarAzerbaijan State University of EconomicsCECaner Erden

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the impact of ESG dynamics on the resilience of critical mineral supply chains through a systematic review.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 106 peer-reviewed studies between 2015 and 2025.
  • Blended quantitative synthesis with qualitative thematic analysis.
  • Utilized descriptive statistics and a correlation matrix to summarize data relationships.
  • Found links between ESG performance and supply chain resilience.
  • Identified barriers to sustainability in critical mineral supply chains.
  • Proposed a Critical Minerals Integrated Sustainability Framework for enhancing supply chain resilience.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Supply chains for critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements are now at the heart of low‐carbon transitions and geopolitical competition. This study conducts a systematic review that blends quantitative synthesis with the contextual richness of qualitative thematic analysis to clarify how these chains are shaped by environmental, social and governance (ESG) dynamics. Drawing on 106 peer‐reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025, this study examines the links between ESG performance, recycling practices, and supply chain resilience through a single integrative lens. Descriptive statistics and a correlation matrix summarize the direction and strength of reported relationships. At the same time, thematic analysis uncovers technical, economic, and institutional barriers, policy misalignments, and regional asymmetries in the sustainable supply of critical minerals. Building on these insights, the paper proposes the Critical Minerals Integrated Sustainability Framework (CMISF), which connects institutional theory with the resource‐based view to explain how ESG capabilities and recycling capacity support resilience. The study highlights the importance of harmonized ESG standards, patient investments in recycling infrastructure, and genuinely collaborative governance among firms, regulators, and communities to sustain critical mineral systems over the long term, with explicit implications for corporate strategy, risk management, and long‐term competitive positioning in critical mineral industries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tutar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8967d6c1944d70ce07edfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70850
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Extracting minerals for the energy transition – Local data for global decision making2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Sustainable separation of rare earth elements from wastes2025 · 14 citations
  3. 3Challenges in Balancing Sustainability, Competitiveness and Geopolitics in Critical Mineral Supply Chains2025 · 10 citations
  4. 4Integrating ESG practices and natural resources management for sustainable economic development in SMEs under the double-carbon target of China2023 · 50 citations
  5. 5Resilience of critical transition minerals supply chain in the context of strategic rivalry: implications for the national policy and regulatory frameworks2025 · 11 citations