PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 31, 2023Children5 citationsOpen Access

Open Pyeloplasty in Infants under 1 Year—Proven or Meaningless?

FVFranziska VauthPZPirmin I. ZöhrerFGFlorian Girtner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children has significantly increased. Nowadays, open pyeloplasty (OP) seems to lose importance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OP in infants 3). The nonvalidated questionnaire showed a high impact of quality of life. Follow-up was in median 30.5 months (0-162 months). OP is still a reliable procedure with good long-term results especially in infants < 1 year of age, which can be performed in a variety of centers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vauth et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8b584ce048d2571bede2chttps://doi.org/10.3390/children10020257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?2019 · 50 citations
  2. 2Kindliche Ureterabgangsstenose in einem Zuweisungszentrum2013 · 2 citations
  3. 3Pediatric Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Comparison With a Cohort of Open Surgery2006 · 357 citations
  4. 4Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success2021 · 46 citations
  5. 5Safety and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared to Open Repair in Infants under 1 Year of Age2021 · 22 citations