PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2013Geophysical Research Letters948 citationsOpen Access

Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there

View Full Paper
RKReto KnuttiNSF National Center for Atmospheric ResearchDMDavid MassonFederal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwissAGAndrew GettelmanNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze new climate models and their interrelations with earlier versions, enhancing understanding of climate projections.
  • Conducted an analysis of new climate models in comparison to older models.
  • Utilized statistical methods to identify similarities between versions of models.
  • Examined how models exchange ideas and code, impacting their development.
  • New model ensemble shows improved agreement with observations compared to older models.
  • Poorer-performing models from the past have been removed from the new ensemble.
  • Interdependence of models complicates understanding of the entire multimodel ensemble.

Abstract

Abstract A new ensemble of climate models is becoming available and provides the basis for climate change projections. Here, we show a first analysis indicating that the models in the new ensemble agree better with observations than those in older ones and that the poorest models have been eliminated. Most models are strongly tied to their predecessors, and some also exchange ideas and code with other models, thus supporting an earlier hypothesis that the models in the new ensemble are neither independent of each other nor independent of the earlier generation. On the basis of one atmosphere model, we show how statistical methods can identify similarities between model versions and complement process understanding in characterizing how and why a model has changed. We argue that the interdependence of models complicates the interpretation of multimodel ensembles but largely goes unnoticed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knutti et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8d27ea5ecc596b5d1895dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design2011 · 14,817 citations
  2. 2Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections2012 · 1,605 citations
  3. 3A Numerical Method for the Study of the Circulation of the World Ocean1997 · 907 citations
  4. 4A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the world ocean1969 · 987 citations
  5. 5Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change2007 · 17,685 citations