PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2016Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention304 citations

Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening

View Full Paper
GHGladys Honein‐AbouHaidarMKMonika KastnerVVVincent Vuong

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Screening reduces the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of colorectal cancer, yet participation tends to be low. We undertook a systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies to identify facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening participation. We searched major bibliographic databases for records published in all languages from inception to February 2015. Included primary studies that elicited views and perceptions towards colorectal cancer screening were appraised for relevance and quality. We used a two-stage synthesis to create an interpretation of colorectal cancer screening decisions grounded in primary studies; a thematic analysis to group themes and systematically compare studies and a meta-synthesis to generate an expanded theory of colorectal cancer screening participation. Ninety-four studies were included. The decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening depended on an individual's awareness of colorectal cancer screening. Awareness affected views of cancer, attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening modalities, and motivation for screening. Factors mediating awareness included public education to address misconceptions, primary care physician efforts to recommend screening, and the influence of friends and family. Specific barriers to participation in populations with lower participation rates included language barriers, logistical challenges to attending screening tests, and cultural beliefs. This study identifies key barriers, facilitators, and mediators to colorectal cancer screening participation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 907-17. ©2016 AACR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Honein‐AbouHaidar et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8eddb2c39562886ae3303https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0990
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian residents with multiple morbidities2011 · 14 citations
  2. 2Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 20082010 · 21,430 citations
  3. 3Integrating Men’s Health and Masculinity Theories to Explain Colorectal Cancer Screening Behavior2013 · 47 citations
  4. 4Identifying Barriers to Colonoscopy Screening for Nonadherent African American Participants in a Patient Navigation Intervention2012 · 67 citations
  5. 5Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans.2005 · 160 citations