PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1963The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science2,667 citations

Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates

View Full Paper
RMRobert A. Mundell

Key Points

  • To examine the theoretical and practical implications of high international capital mobility for domestic stabilization policy across fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes.
  • Formulated a theoretical macroeconomic model under the assumption of perfect capital mobility, where domestic interest rates cannot diverge from foreign rates.
  • Assessed stabilization mechanisms across open economies with reference to integrated European financial centers and Canadian-US market dynamics.
  • Extreme capital mobility eliminates a central authority's ability to independently control domestic interest rates or isolate money markets from international conditions.
  • The capacity of fiscal and monetary tools to stabilize an economy depends critically on whether exchange rates are fixed or flexible under free capital flows.

Abstract

The world is still a closed economy, but its regions and countries are becoming increasingly open. The trend, which has been manifested in both freer movement of goods and increased mobility of capital, has been stimulated by the dismantling of trade and exchange controls in Europe, the gradual erosion of the real burden of tariff protection, and the stability, unparalleled since 1914, of the exchange rates. The international economic climate has changed in the direction of financial integration and this has important implications for economic policy. My paper concerns the theoretical and practical implications of the increased mobility of capital. In order to present my conclusions in the simplest possible way, and to bring the implications for policy into sharpest relief, I assume the extreme degree of mobility that prevails when a country cannot maintain an interest rate different from the general level prevailing abroad. This assumption will overstate the case but it has the merit of posing a stereotype towards which international financial relations seem to be heading. At the same time it might be argued that the assumption is not far from the truth in those financial centres, of which Zurich, Amsterdam, and Brussels may be taken as examples, where the authorities already recognize their lessening ability to dominate money market conditions and insulate them from foreign influences. It should also have a high degree of relevance to a country like Canada whose financial markets are dominated to a great degree by the vast New York market.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robert A. Mundell (1963) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8ef1fa5ecc596b5d18c3ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/139336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper