PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 5, 2018Critical Care Medicine195 citations

A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database*

View Full Paper
AJAlistair E. W. JohnsonJAJérôme AboabJRJesse D. Raffa

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The new organ dysfunction-based Sepsis-3 criteria have been proposed as a clinical method for identifying sepsis. These criteria identified a larger, less severely ill cohort than that identified by previously used administrative definitions. The Sepsis-3 criteria have several advantages over prior methods, including less susceptibility to coding practices changes, provision of temporal context, and possession of high construct validity. However, the Sepsis-3 criteria also present new challenges, especially when calculated retrospectively. Future studies on sepsis should recognize the differences in outcome incidence among identification methods and contextualize their findings according to the different cohorts identified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Johnson et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8f6d5d2f7327e70ae4ab6https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000002965
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper