PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1982International Organization2,611 citations

Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables

View Full Paper
SKStephen D. Krasner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

International regimes are defined as principles, norms, rules, and decisionmaking procedures around which actor expectations converge in a given issue-area. As a starting point, regimes have been conceptualized as intervening variables, standing between basic causal factors and related outcomes and behavior. There are three views about the importance of regimes: conventional structural orientations dismiss regimes as being at best ineffectual; Grotian orientations view regimes as an intimate component of the international system; and modified structural perspectives see regimes as significant only under certain constrained conditions. For Grotian and modified structuralist arguments, which endorse the view that regimes can influence outcomes and behavior, regime development is seen as a function of five basic causal variables: egoistic self-interest, political power, diffuse norms and principles, custom and usage, and knowledge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stephen D. Krasner (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d900bc7e3358c846d17e58https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300018920
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper