PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 15, 1998Journal of Neuroscience1,301 citationsOpen Access

Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI

View Full Paper
JCJennifer T. CoullANAnna C. Nobre

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Although attention is distributed across time as well as space, the temporal allocation of attention has been less well researched than its spatial counterpart. A temporal analog of the covert spatial orientation task Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160-174 was developed to compare the neural systems involved in directing attention to spatial locations versus time intervals. We asked whether there exists a general system for allocating attentional resources, independent of stimulus dimension, or whether functionally specialized brain regions are recruited for directing attention toward spatial versus temporal aspects of the environment. We measured brain activity in seven healthy volunteers by using positron emission tomography (PET) and in eight healthy volunteers by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The task manipulated cued attention to spatial locations (S) and temporal intervals (T) in a factorial design. Symbolic central cues oriented subjects toward S only (left or right), toward T only (300 msec or 1500 msec), toward both S and T simultaneously, or provided no information regarding S or T. Subjects also were scanned during a resting baseline condition. Behavioral data showed benefits and costs for performance during temporal attention similar to those established for spatial attention. Brain-imaging data revealed a partial overlap between neural systems involved in the performance of spatial versus temporal orientation of attention tasks. Additionally, hemispheric asymmetries revealed preferential right and left parietal activation for spatial and temporal attention, respectively. Parietal cortex was activated bilaterally by attending to both dimensions simultaneously. This is the first direct comparison of the neural correlates of attending to spatial versus temporal cues.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coull et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d91aaf3e67f8d138684046https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07426.1998
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training1996 · 1,008 citations
  2. 2Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?1992 · 1,251 citations
  3. 3The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans1990 · 864 citations
  4. 4Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing1993 · 938 citations
  5. 5Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography1991 · 1,299 citations