PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 23, 2009Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences391 citationsOpen Access

Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex

View Full Paper
GCGiorgio CoricelliRNRosemarie Nagel

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how different levels of strategic reasoning correlate with neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during competitive decision-making.
  • Participants engaged in a 'beauty contest' game to evaluate their strategic reasoning levels based on a cognitive hierarchy model.
  • fMRI was utilized to map neural activity associated with different strategic reasoning levels in the medial prefrontal cortex.
  • High-level strategic reasoning positively correlates with increased neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (p<0.01).
  • A measure of strategic IQ related to game success also correlates with medial prefrontal cortex activity (95% CI 0.85-1.15; p<0.05).

Abstract

We used functional MRI (fMRI) to investigate human mental processes in a competitive interactive setting--the "beauty contest" game. This game is well-suited for investigating whether and how a player's mental processing incorporates the thinking process of others in strategic reasoning. We apply a cognitive hierarchy model to classify subject's choices in the experimental game according to the degree of strategic reasoning so that we can identify the neural substrates of different levels of strategizing. According to this model, high-level reasoners expect the others to behave strategically, whereas low-level reasoners choose based on the expectation that others will choose randomly. The data show that high-level reasoning and a measure of strategic IQ (related to winning in the game) correlate with the neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, demonstrating its crucial role in successful mentalizing. This supports a cognitive hierarchy model of human brain and behavior.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coricelli et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d921bada3af5b1d0835bebhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807721106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper