PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2018Circulation450 citationsOpen Access

Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

View Full Paper
SDSrinivas R. DukkipatiSKSaibal KarDHDavid R. Holmes

Structured PICO

Does device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device increase the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
1,739 patients with atrial fibrillation who received a Watchman left atrial appendage closure device across 4 prospective FDA trials (PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, CAP, CAP2), mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.0.
I
Intervention
Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device
C
Comparator
Patients without device-related thrombus (DRT)
O
Outcome
Incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE)hard clinical

Device-related thrombus after Watchman implantation is infrequent (3.7%) but is associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism.

Abstract

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of device-related thrombus (DRT) using a large series of clinical trial cohorts of patients undergoing Watchman implantation. Methods: We studied the device arms of 4 prospective Food and Drug Administration trials: PROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) (n=463); PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) (n=269); CAP (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry) (n=566); and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL registry) (n=578). Surveillance transesophageal echocardiographs were performed at 45 days and 12 months in all patients, and also at 6 months in the randomized control trials. We assessed both the incidence of DRT during these transesophageal echocardiographs (and other unscheduled transesophageal echocardiographs), and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and adjusted for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Results: Of 1739 patients who received an implant (7159 patient-years follow-up; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc=4.0), DRT was seen in 65 patients (3.74%). The rates of SSE with and without DRT were 7.46 and 1.78 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval CI, 2.18–5.79; P <0.001), and ischemic SSE rates were 6.28 and 1.65 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.90–5.45, P <0.001). On multivariable modeling analysis, the predictors of DRT were as follows: history of transient ischemic attack or stroke (odds ratio OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26–4.25; P =0.007), permanent atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.19–4.20; P =0.012); vascular disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08–3.91; P =0.028); left atrial appendage diameter (OR, 1.06 per mm increase; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P =0.019); left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.96 per 1% increase; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P =0.009). DRT and SSE both occurred in 17 of 65 patients (26.2%). Of the 19 SSE events in these patients with DRT, 9 of 19 (47.4%) and 12 of 19 (63.2%) occurred within 1 and 6 months of DRT detection. Conversely, after left atrial appendage closure, most SSEs (123/142, 86.62%) occurred in patients without DRT. Conclusions: After left atrial appendage closure with Watchman, DRT (≈3.7%) is not frequent but, when present, is associated with a higher rate of stroke and systemic embolism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dukkipati et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d923e4da3af5b1d0835c5ahttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.035090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 15-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure2017 · 1,025 citations
  2. 2Device Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Is Related to Patient and Procedural Characteristics but Not to Duration of Postimplantation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy2018 · 123 citations
  3. 3Device-Related Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation2018 · 362 citations
  4. 4Use of non-warfarin oral anticoagulants instead of warfarin during left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device2016 · 109 citations
  5. 5Real-world safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN LAA closure at one year in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the DAPT subgroup from the EWOLUTION all-comers study2018 · 58 citations