Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This study evaluates the uncertainties of turbulent flux calculation using eddy covariance (EC) and wavelet analysis (WA) methods. First, a non‐stationary data set is concocted by adding periodic waves and random perturbations which mimic the large eddies, turbulent intermittency, and asymmetry into an observational stationary data set, and the theoretical “true” fluxes are used to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of these methods. Results show that EC and Morlet‐wavelet generate biases ranging 50%–100% of the “true” values at different non‐stationarity grades, whereas the Mexican hat (Mexhat) wavelet has a bias of about half of them. Furthermore, there is a high correlation of the Mexhat‐derived fluxes to the benchmark values, the regression slopes of the values of these two can be improved to almost 1 by adding a correction coefficient. The results suggest the potential of using the Mexhat‐wavelet method to calculate turbulent fluxes with high accuracy under non‐stationary conditions.
Li et al. (2023) studied this question.