PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 23, 2007Internal Medicine Journal43 citations

Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests

View Full Paper
ISIan ScottPGP. B. GreenbergPPP. J. Poole

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The use of investigational tests in making a diagnosis is a core activity of physicians and one that requires an understanding of the accuracy and usefulness of specific tests in discriminating between several diagnostic possibilities. Studies of diagnostic tests are frequently methodologically flawed and their results are often not well understood or applied in clinical practice. This article defines the performance characteristics of diagnostic tests, describes several commonly encountered deficiencies in study design which may invalidate reports of new diagnostic tests, and explains a Bayesian approach to interpreting test results in terms of disease probability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scott et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d93b39e6ab964fb083596dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01436.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper