PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2024Applied Sciences15 citationsOpen Access

Workload Assessment of Operators: Correlation Between NASA-TLX and Pupillary Responses

YWYun WuYZYao ZhangBZBin Zheng

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Operators in high-stress environments often face significant cognitive demands that can impair their performance, underscoring the need for comprehensive workload assessment. This study aims to study the relationship between subjective self-reported measures, the NASA task load index (NASA-TLX), objective bio-signal measures, and pupillary responses. The participants engaged in either a visual tracking task or a laparoscopic visuomotor task while their eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro Nano eye tracker (Tobii Technology Inc., Stockholm, Sweden). Immediately after completing the tasks, participants provided NASA-TLX scores to assess their perceived workload. The study tested three hypotheses: first, whether increased pupil dilation correlates with higher NASA-TLX scores; second, whether task type affects workload; and third, whether task repetition influences workload. The results showed a moderate positive correlation between pupil size and NASA-TLX scores (r = 0.513, p < 0.001). The laparoscopic surgery task, which requires visuomotor coordination, resulted in significantly higher NASA-TLX scores (t = –6.23, p < 0.001), larger original pupil sizes (t = –22.57, p < 0.001), and more adjusted pupil sizes (t = –22.57, p < 0.001) than the purely visual task. Additionally, task repetition led to a significant reduction in the NASA-TLX scores (t = 2.86, p = 0.005), the original mean pupil size (t = 5.50, p < 0.001), and the adjusted pupil size (t = 6.34, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the study confirms a positive correlation between NASA-TLX scores and pupillary responses. Task type and repetition were found to influence workload and pupillary responses. The findings demonstrate the value of using both subjective and objective measures for workload assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d94c0416f0d2beeba3c512https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Subjective and Objective Quantification of the Effect of Distraction on Physician’s Workload and Performance During Simulated Laparoscopic Surgery2019 · 26 citations
  2. 2Affective response to volitional input perturbations in obstacle avoidance and target tracking games2021 · 3 citations
  3. 3How to assess sympathetic activity in humans1999 · 455 citations
  4. 4Impact of Operator Fatigue on Endoscopy Performance: Implications for Procedure Scheduling2008 · 40 citations
  5. 5Measuring Cognitive Workload in Augmented Reality Learning Environments Through Pupil Area Analysis2024 · 4 citations