PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 20, 2010Journal of Sports Sciences72 citations

Pivot task increases knee frontal plane loading compared with sidestep and drop-jump

View Full Paper
NCNelson CortésJOJames A. OñateBLBonnie Van Lunen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess kinematic and kinetic differences between three tasks (drop-jump, sidestep cutting, and pivot tasks) commonly used to evaluate anterior cruciate ligament risk factors. Nineteen female collegiate soccer athletes from a Division I institution participated in this study. Participants performed a drop-jump task, and two unanticipated tasks, sidestep cutting and pivot. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to assess differences in the kinematic and kinetic parameters between tasks. The pivot task had lower knee flexion (-41.2 ± 8.8°) and a higher valgus angle (-7.6 ± 10.1°) than the sidestep (-53.9 ± 9.4° and -2.9 ± 10.0°, respectively) at maximum vertical ground reaction force. The pivot task (0.8 ± 0.3 multiples of body weight) had higher peak posterior ground reaction force than the drop-jump (0.3 ± 0.06 multiples of body weight) and sidestep cutting (0.3 ± 0.1 multiples of body weight), as well as higher internal varus moments (0.72 ± 0.3 N · m/kg · m) than the drop-jump (0.14 ± 0.07 N · m/kg · m) and sidestep (0.17 ± 0.5 N · m/kg · m) at peak stance. During the pivot task, the athletes presented a more erect posture and adopted strategies that may place higher loads on the knee joint and increase the strain on the anterior cruciate ligament.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cortés et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d96ea194760e72e6a3c6fchttps://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.523087
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper