PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2021Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry80 citations

Standardization for the Triple Oxygen Isotope System: Waters, Silicates, Carbonates, Air, and Sulfates

View Full Paper
ZSZ. D. SharpJWJordan A.G. Wostbrock

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Research Article| January 01, 2021 Standardization for the Triple Oxygen Isotope System: Waters, Silicates, Carbonates, Air, and Sulfates Zachary D. Sharp; Zachary D. Sharp Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA * E-mail: zsharp@unm.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jordan A.G. Wostbrock Jordan A.G. Wostbrock Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2021) 86 (1): 179–196. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2021.86.05 Article history first online: 04 Jan 2021 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Zachary D. Sharp, Jordan A.G. Wostbrock; Standardization for the Triple Oxygen Isotope System: Waters, Silicates, Carbonates, Air, and Sulfates. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2021;; 86 (1): 179–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2021.86.05 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search Stable isotope analyses are a relative measurement. The precision is far higher than the accuracy, so that subtle isotopic differences must be made relative to a reference. Modern mass spectrometers can routinely measure the δ18O value of a gas with a precision of 0.01‰. This is 20 times more precise than the accuracy of the 18O/16O ratio of VSMOW (Baertschi 1976). It is for this reason that isotope analyses, like most analytical measurements, are reported relative to standards. The problem faced by the stable isotope community is that different materials are measured using... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharp et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d983a02a25b240b7a3cb3ahttps://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2021.86.05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Why Measure 17O? Historical Perspective, Triple-Isotope Systematics and Selected Applications2021 · 44 citations
  2. 2Calculation of fractionation factors for carbon and oxygen isotopic exchange in the system calcite-carbon dioxide-water1968 · 552 citations
  3. 3Two New Carbonate Stable‐Isotope Standards1982 · 129 citations
  4. 4Standardizing the reporting of Δʹ17O data from high precision oxygen triple-isotope ratio measurements of silicate rocks and minerals2019 · 57 citations
  5. 5The oxygen isotope composition of San Carlos olivine on the VSMOW2‐SLAP2 scale2016 · 124 citations