PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2018296 citationsOpen Access

SemEval-2018 Task 3: Irony Detection in English Tweets

View Full Paper
CHCynthia Van HeeUniversity of CopenhagenELEls LefeverUniversity College GhentVHVéronique HosteGhent University Hospital

Key Points

  • This task aims to develop systems that detect irony in tweets and classify the type of irony expressed.
  • Collected tweets using irony-related hashtags and manually annotated them for accuracy.
  • Provided a training corpus of 3,834 tweets and a test set of 784 tweets.
  • Involved submissions from 43 teams for binary classification and 31 teams for multiclass classification.
  • Achieved F 1 score of 0.71 for binary irony detection in Task A.
  • Achieved F 1 score of 0.51 for fine-grained irony classification in Task B.
  • Demonstrated that fine-grained classification is more difficult than binary detection.

Abstract

This paper presents the first shared task on irony detection: given a tweet, automatic natural language processing systems should determine whether the tweet is ironic (Task A) and which type of irony (if any) is expressed (Task B). The ironic tweets were collected using irony-related hashtags (i.e. #irony, #sarcasm, #not) and were subsequently manually annotated to minimise the amount of noise in the corpus. Prior to distributing the data, hashtags that were used to collect the tweets were removed from the corpus. For both tasks, a training corpus of 3,834 tweets was provided, as well as a test set containing 784 tweets. Our shared tasks received submissions from 43 teams for the binary classification Task A and from 31 teams for the multiclass Task B. The highest classification scores obtained for both subtasks are respectively F 1 = 0.71 and F 1 = 0.51 and demonstrate that fine-grained irony classification is much more challenging than binary irony detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hee et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d98e43a1d151c65f6847adhttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s18-1005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can machines sense irony? : exploring automatic irony detection on social media2017 · 24 citations
  2. 2The bicoherence theory of situational irony2001 · 103 citations
  3. 3Class-based n -gram models of natural language1992 · 2,883 citations
  4. 4Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python2012 · 63,984 citations
  5. 5Automatic Sarcasm Detection2017 · 409 citations