PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2017Journal of the American College of Cardiology489 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

SYSung-Han YoonSBSabine BleizifferOBOle De Backer

Structured PICO

Does TAVR in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis yield similar prognosis and device success rates compared to tricuspid aortic valve stenosis?

P
Population
Patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve stenosis
I
Intervention
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis
C
Comparator
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) for tricuspid aortic valve stenosis
O
Outcome
Prognosis and device success rate

TAVR provides similar prognostic outcomes in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis, and new-generation devices appear to mitigate historical procedural differences.

Abstract

Compared with tricuspid AS, TAVR in bicuspid AS was associated with a similar prognosis, but lower device success rate. Procedural differences were observed in patients treated with the early-generation devices, whereas no differences were observed with the new-generation devices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoon et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d98e692a25b240b7a3cdb7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper