PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2009Archives of Internal Medicine437 citationsOpen Access

A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain

View Full Paper
DCDaniel C. CherkinKSKaren J. ShermanAAAndrew L. Avins

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Although acupuncture was found effective for chronic low back pain, tailoring needling sites to each patient and penetration of the skin appear to be unimportant in eliciting therapeutic benefits. These findings raise questions about acupuncture's purported mechanisms of action. It remains unclear whether acupuncture or our simulated method of acupuncture provide physiologically important stimulation or represent placebo or nonspecific effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cherkin et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9d9979a6164e50fa3d989https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.65
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.1992 · 33,990 citations
  2. 2Developing a research strategy for acupuncture2005 · 7 citations
  3. 3Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1981.1984 · 502 citations
  4. 4Lost Productive Time and Cost Due to Common Pain Conditions in the US Workforce2003 · 1,590 citations
  5. 5Estimates and Patterns of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Back Pain in the United States2003 · 849 citations