PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026JCO Precision Oncology1 citations

Bespoke Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Diagnostic Resolution, Disease Surveillance, and Treatment Monitoring in Hepatopancreatobiliary Malignancies: A Real-World Experience

View Full Paper
OAOluseyi AbidoyeAPAngelo PirozziNONaohiro Okano

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of personalized ctDNA testing in diagnosing and monitoring hepatopancreatobiliary cancers.
  • Retrospective analysis of personalized ctDNA assay use in 54 HPB cancer patients.
  • Longitudinal assessment of ctDNA for surveillance, monitoring, and diagnosis.
  • Comparison of ctDNA findings with imaging and tumor markers.
  • ctDNA was evaluable in 37 out of 54 patients (84.6%), with 22 testing positive (59.5%).
  • Success rates by tumor type: 72.7% in PDAC, 90.9% in HCC, and 52.4% in CCA.
  • ctDNA concordant with imaging in 72.6% of assessments and with tumor markers in 41%.
  • Clinical applications included 38.9% for disease surveillance and 44.4% for treatment monitoring.

Abstract

PURPOSE Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers—including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and gallbladder cancer—are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. The emergence of personalized liquid biopsy technologies, particularly bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offers new opportunities for improving clinical management. Traditional methods like imaging and tumor markers may miss early recurrence or evolving disease. This study explores the real-world application of ctDNA in HPB cancers, focusing on its use for surveillance, diagnostic clarification, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the use of a personalized ctDNA assay (Signatera, Natera) in 54 patients with HPB cancers at a single academic cancer center. The cohort included PDAC (22/54), HCC (11/54), and CCA (21/54). ctDNA was assessed longitudinally for surveillance, treatment monitoring, or diagnostic clarification. Concordance with imaging and tumor markers, as well as lead time to recurrence detection, was descriptively analyzed. RESULTS ctDNA was evaluable in 37/54 patients (84.6%), with ctDNA positivity in 22/37 (59.5%). Success rates by tumor type were 16/22 (72.7%) in PDAC, 10/11 (90.9%) in HCC, and 11/21 (52.4%) in CCA. ctDNA concordance with imaging was observed in 69/85 assessments (72.6%) and with tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 or alpha fetoprotein) in 39/95 (41%). Clinical applications included disease surveillance (21/54, 38.9%), treatment monitoring (24/54, 44.4%), and diagnostic clarification (16/54, 29.6%). In patients with recurrence, ctDNA detected disease before imaging in several cases, with a median lead time of 28 days (range, 1 month to 7 months). CONCLUSION Personalized ctDNA testing demonstrated meaningful utility across HPB cancers, enabling early recurrence detection and guiding clinical decision making as a complementary tool in multidisciplinary care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abidoye et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e55278050d08c1b758eahttps://doi.org/10.1200/po-25-00621
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper